Cited. 173 C. 545; 182 C. 176; 183 C. 386; 188 C. 542; 190 C. 559; 194 C. 438; Id., 650; 196 C. 305; Id., 567; 197 C. 166; Id., 201; Id., 247; Id., 309; 198 C. 1; 199 C. 30; Id., 308; Id., 462; 200 C. 113; 202 C. 615; 203 C. 484; 209 C. 23; 213 C. 233; 216 C. 273; 235 C. 679; 241 C. 439.
Cited. 2 CA 537; 5 CA 113; 7 CA 326; 8 CA 125; Id., 478; 9 CA 349; 13 CA 420; Id., 576; Id., 596; 14 CA 272; Id., 472; 16 CA 433; 17 CA 460; 19 CA 495; 20 CA 271; Id., 369; 21 CA 248; 29 CA 843; 35 CA 566; Id., 714; 39 CA 810; 44 CA 187; Id., 294; 46 CA 691. Since statute's language includes both taking of property and subsequent retention of the stolen property, to charge defendant with two counts of larceny is improper; they are not separately punishable and to so charge violates defendant's constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy. 100 CA 565.
Requisites for accepting plea of guilty. 31 CS 501. Cited. 32 CS 650; 35 CS 531; 38 CS 549.
Subsec. (a):
Cited. 169 C. 247; 174 C. 129; Id., 129; 178 C. 427; Id., 689; 181 C. 299; 182 C. 476; 186 C. 426; 187 C. 264; 188 C. 325; Id., 671; 190 C. 191; 191 C. 180; 195 C. 421; 196 C. 36; Id., 115; 198 C. 203; Id., 490; 200 C. 9; 201 C. 462; 206 C. 657; 207 C. 118; 208 C. 365; 210 C. 652; 211 C. 101; 212 C. 223; 213 C. 422; 215 C. 716; 219 C. 160; 220 C. 487; 223 C. 243; 232 C. 455; 233 C. 552; 235 C. 67; 238 C. 784; 239 C. 235; 240 C. 317. Subdiv. (3): Rational basis exists for legislature to classify larceny from the person as a more serious offense than simple robbery and therefore the classification did not violate defendant's right to equal protection of the laws. 246 C. 132. For defendant to be found guilty of larceny in the third degree, state must prove that defendant committed larceny by defrauding a public community. 252 C. 229. P.A. 09-138, which increased the minimum value element from $5,000 to $10,000, did not have retroactive effect. 314 C. 529.
Cited. 1 CA 270; Id., 378, 379. Subdiv. (3): Larceny from the person requires an actual trespass to the person of the victim and therefore taking a radio which was in the vicinity of the victim, but not on the victim's person, did not constitute larceny under section. Id., 642. Cited. 3 CA 126; 8 CA 491; 11 CA 102; 12 CA 239; Id., 408; Id., 685; 13 CA 12; Id., 554; 14 CA 169; Id., 493; 20 CA 513; 24 CA 697; 26 CA 52; Id., 114; Id., 279; 28 CA 306; 30 CA 606; 31 CA 47; Id., 94; Id., 312; 32 CA 21; 33 CA 468; 34 CA 250; Id., 610; Id., 699; 35 CA 740; 38 CA 643; 39 CA 579; Id., 840; 40 CA 21; 41 CA 391; Id., 584; Id., 817; 42 CA 810; 46 CA 414; Id., 616. Court found that money was “taken from the person of the victim” in case in which victim was tricked into turning over her money to defendant. 56 CA 428. Subdiv. (3): Wrongfully taking property from the person of another constitutes a trespass of the person, and such a taking from the person constitutes larceny in the second degree. 95 CA 248. Larceny in second degree under section is not ordinarily lesser included offense of robbery for purposes of double jeopardy. 109 CA 74. Subdiv. (5): Section not unconstitutionally void for vagueness and provided sufficient notice that embezzlement from an estate is prohibited even if conduct occurred after separate conservator of estate was appointed. 121 CA 190; judgment affirmed, see 307 C. 592. Subsec., as amended by P.A. 09-138 to increase the value of property taken for the commission of larceny in the second degree, does not apply retroactively to defendant's case; legislature stated that the provision was effective October 1, 2009, without any express language referring to retroactivity and the legislative history does not indicate a clear or unequivocal intent for it to apply retroactively. 136 CA 427; judgment affirmed, see 314 C. 570. Subdiv. (3): Defendant's conviction of and sentencing under this Subdiv. and Secs. 53a-48(a) and 53a-124(a)(2) constitute multiple punishments for the same offense and violate defendant's right against double jeopardy. 176 CA 687.
Cited. 36 CS 603; 37 CS 527.